My own two cents: Is an attack considered a "terror attack" if it is carried out by one person acting alone, not under a terrorist organization? Assuming it is, how would a nation combat such a string of terror? While [I believe] it is near impossible to stop a single madman acting alone before an attack, if there is an obvious pattern (in this case, devout Muslims), what should be done to attempt to stop such attacks?
Please take the Jewish Economics Survey and help build the economic future of the Orthodox Jewish community.
Read more about the survey, including discussion and information about its findings and the presentation given on it, here.
Thursday, February 15, 2007
Salt Lake Terror?
(Hat tip: Pamela H) Two interesting and thought-provoking articles about the attack in a Utah mall by a Bosnian Muslim that killed 5:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
We should do the same thing we did after 9-11 -- invade a completely unrelated country. Seriously, this is why terrorism should be treated with intelligence and police-work instead of warfare.
ReplyDeleteWe should do the same thing we did after 9-11 -- invade a completely unrelated country.
ReplyDelete...not buying, though I honestly never thought the Iraq War was specific to 9/11, but rather related to the war on terror as a whole and a good, specific beginning point in terms of removing dictators and spreading democracy in the Middle East. (See the video I linked to a couple of days ago.)
Seriously, this is why terrorism should be treated with intelligence and police-work instead of warfare.
Oy - bad pre-9/11 POV. Police work is wonderful after it's too late; terrorism needs to be attacked in advance to be stopped.
Now, we can argue about whether it's better to attack the people who carry out the attacks or to try and change the world or the people in order to convince them they don't want to carry out attacks in the first place: Personally, I think it's a combination of both.
JA - wrong again on these issues. That's the mentality that will ultimately result in our demise and that which the democrats incessantly persist in thinking will work.
ReplyDeleteBut I did notice that when it was initially reported, I couldn't find any news agency willing to give this miscreant's pedigree. He's another muslim fanatic and there will be more of them unless we deal with the terrorist threat head-on and very seriously. It might also help to call a spade a spade. A rose by any other name is still a rose. A terrorist is a terrorist is a terrorist. He wasn't just a crazed knucklehead.