What's worse, (1) using the power of the presidency to capture and detain dangerous terrorists or (2) using that office to negate legal, valid and binding contracts. I vote for (2).
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Comment of the Day
On MoC's fantastic post, explaining how moronic it is to go after AIG over bonus money given out because they were part of legally binding contracts, however much we don't like them, a commenter named Michael said the following: