Well, dear people. What can I tell you.
At the rally for Darfur in Central Park (which I attended this past Sunday,) I was given a blue bandanna. A blue bandanna saying "AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL" and the like. I tied said blue bandanna in my hair, and upon looking at myself, decided I liked the overall effect. It was pretty. It kept my hair out of my face. It's comfortable. In other words, I have now come upon a realization- I like bandannas, scarves, and other hairpieces. Not the ones that hurt like the dickens. Just pretty pieces of cloth.
So I decided to wear said bandanna to my Chumash class. I tie it over my head (it covers most, but not all, of my hair) and go to class. I realize that nobody else in my class is wearing anything in their hair. Maybe a sparkly barrette or a hairclip, but nothing like what I've done.
And so it was that my Chumash teacher inquired, very innocently and sweetly, "Dear, did you get married over the weekend?"
I blushed and said, "No!" very sternly, perhaps more sternly than I had meant, as she smiled and said, "Oh, well, I like to keep up with the news."
I went to tell my friend (she's in the Advanced Talmud Program) this story, still wearing my bandanna. My tone is indignant as I say with horror, "she thought I was MARRIED!"
That's when my friend's study partner turns to me and says, "Well, are you?"
Ye gods, my dear people. Ye gods.
Now to the tale of the librarian.
I'm a freshman, right? I've never used the library before. I don't know what kind of system they've got, what kind of card-cataloguing goes on, and so on and so forth. So I enter the library and say that there is a 'sefer' or Judaic work that I need called 'Halichois Baisah." The librarian looks at me with a distinctly unfriendly glance and informs me I need a call number.
I go off in search for a call number. But how, how, how, do I get the computer to type in Hebrew? After much work I realize that I press ALT + SHIFT to toggle between Hebrew and English. (About five minutes later I look down at the base of the computer and realize there's a sign that says that. Just how tired am I?)
Anyway. I go to check out the book (because there's an absurd rule that even these books, when used in the library, must be checked out.) I am allowed to have the book until 11:54 PM (generous, isn't it- two hours exactly. *rolls eyes*) The librarian scans the book with her exciting laser-gun appliance, and I reach over to take it, sliding it across the desk. She takes it back and says, "Don't take the book! First of all, it's rude to grab it from me, and secondly, I have to write down how long you can have it for."
Stunned into silence on account of my apparent "rudeness" in reaching for a book that is for all purposes MINE now, I nod my head and acquiesce.
The next sefer I need is the Igros Moshe. I come to her with a call number, very proud of myself, only to have her point out to me (and shake her head wearily at my infinite stupidity) that the book I want is in the Gottesman Library on the YU Campus. She finally scrolls down and points me to the reference section.
I want to call my father to find out what "OC" means in the reference (Igros Moshe OC 2:26) but this woman literally comes over and claps her hands in front of me, shrieking "No cell phones!"
Now the fact is, I frequent libraries very, very often. I am considerate of people. I do not begin two-hour conversations in libraries. And I'm telling you that a two-minute conversation with my father asking what OC means would not have upset or alarmed anyone in that library. But that can't happen. No, I have to get up, walk outside the library, talk to my father for about two minutes (and I'm not even talking, just listening) and then walk back inside. Grrr!
I wanted to see old tests that my Biology teacher has given, but by this time I realize that this woman views everything I have to say, ask or do as a great bother, and so I don't even try. You have to wonder at the logic of it, though. This is the library. I'm really not out to get you. I just don't know what the rules are. I don't KNOW about call numbers or the Gottesman Library. So please take pity on me!
This reminds me of an old Calvin and Hobbes strip.
ReplyDeleteFrom the reputation librarians have, I'd say that woman was a rare prototype of that very reputation.
DARFUR, URGENT: WHAT WOULD RACHEL CORRIE START THIS WEEK?
ReplyDeleteDarfur Vigil DAY 118 (now in NYC); 56 Days Hunger Strike since July 4, 2006 www.standwithdarfurwhitehouseii.blogspot.com
Young Rachel Corrie saw a bulldozer intentionally bearing down on the house of a family, a family she probably never knew. She got in front of that bulldozer, between the bulldozer and the house, between the threat, and the innocents. "This has to stop. I think it is a good idea for us all to drop everything and devote our lives to making this stop. I don’t think it’s an extremist thing to do anymore." DARFUR GENOCIDE. WE-CITIZENS SITTING IN COMFORT AND SAFETY IN THE FACE OF GENOCIDE, "THIS HAS TO STOP." (http://www.criticalconcern.com/rachelcorrie.html.)
We need to get between what is killing Darfur (Bashir's performance and the nonperformance by we-the-people, we world citizens) - and our children, sisters and brothers in Darfur. Now. And as of now we are not (http://standwithdarfurwhitehouseii.blogspot.com/2006/09/sept-17th-activism-awesome-but-not.html) How do we do that? How do we make it happen? What would a sufficient "wake up" look like? IF SOMEONE HAS THIS ALREADY STARTED, LET ME KNOW. I'll join you, or even back out if that is best.
I am deciding what I will do next, what I expect to be my final attempt to spark the Rescue of Darfur by waking up sufficient numbers of we humans in time, converting us from spectators, critics and activists-of-convenience into antiviolent warriors (think Civil Rights struggle) of profound courage, wisdom, tenacity and effectiveness; utilizing to the max the few weeks, days and seconds that our Darfur family has left.
What would Rachel Corrie start THIS WEEK? This question strikes me as the way to approach the task of deciding. The way to focus the mind to come up with the appropriate, proportional response of greatest chance - THE BEST AIMED "HAIL MARY" PASS.
Rachel Corrie stood in front of a bulldozer about to destroy a house of people she did not know (http://www.criticalconcern.com/rachelcorrie.html). Would a different role model help you more? How about Steve Beko (South Africa, movie, Denzel), a young Gandhi, a young Nelson Mandella, an antivioloent Rambo, Deitrich Bonhoeffer, John Q (from the Denzel Washington movie)...? You get the idea. Think of your own role model APPROPRIATE to this situation.
LET’S JOIN TOGETHER IN THIS QUANDARY, before it is too late, please: Send me, or post, your ideas (http://standwithdarfurwhitehouseii.blogspot.com/). Now. I expect to embark on whatever best plan by early next week at the latest, with anyone that wants to join together.
A CONSTRAINT: Suggestions must centrally embrace this notion of the problem from Samantha Power's inspired, Pulitzer Prize-winning book, "Problem from Hell" (and I paraphrase AND take license): THE BATTLE TO STOP GENOCIDE HAS ALWAYS BEEN LOST ON THE FIELD OF PUBLIC OPINION. THE PEOPLE [WE THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD]... HAVE NEVER STOOD UP SUFFICIENTLY TO STOP IT.
HUNCH: The plan should involve leveraging STAND's Oct 5th Fast to make it into the END OF THE GONOICIDE, the START of a WORLDWIDE FAST UNTIL DARFUR GENOCIDE IS ENDING. One-day only by all participants is too-little-too-late. A one day fast is NOT what the world's response to the Holocaust, the extermination of 6,000,000 Jews lacked. Not by many orders of magnitude. Death rates are climbing toward 25,000 per week in Darfur, NOW. We must be REALISTIC. Code Pink's "Troops Home Fast" could be a model (www.troopshomefast.org). Make STAND's October 5th the START? THAT COULD DO IT.
But, WE NEED EVEN BETTER, MUCH BETTER SUGGESTIONS and specific ideas for approach and execution than I am hinting at.
RESPOND. PLEASE. Now; because THERE IS NO MORE T-I-M-E. (For those of you that just want to watch, and have a good laugh at my frantic gyrations, enjoy.)
What would Rachel Corrie start THIS WEEK?
Jay McGinley (jymcginley@cs.com) 484-356-6243
I hear you on the hair thing. I often wear headbands, mainly because I like them and they keep my hair out of my face. I often have people telling me that they thought my hair was a sheitel, because of the headband. I politely correct them. (Sometimes I wear bandanas also, for the same reasons - they keep my hair out of my face.)
ReplyDeleteI hear you on the hair thing. I often wear headbands, mainly because I like them and they keep my hair out of my face. I often have people telling me that they thought my hair was a sheitel, because of the headband. I politely correct them. (Sometimes I wear bandanas also, for the same reasons - they keep my hair out of my face.)
ReplyDeleteWell now you've learned something very important. Which is that EVERYONE in NY is rude. Put that in your bandana and wear it.
ReplyDeleteWearing a bandanna, or even a headband (especially with straight hair) can be hazardous in Stern if you're unmarried; all of a sudden, people are assuming things about you.
ReplyDeleteSomeone should have warned you that some of the librarians are rather crotchety. I'd recommend dropping by at different times of day so you can figure out when the cranky ones are off-duty.
Oh, and "OC" stands for Orach Chaim. :)
Scraps: Isn't it cool that there's a TV show named for the Orach Chayim?
ReplyDeletehmmm... so it's not just me that avoids wearing hats then!
ReplyDeleteis that what OC stands for?! ;) (my fave show of course)
Most annoying is when my dates choose to get sunburnt on a hot summer day rather than wear a hat. If random passersby were to assume mistakenly that we were married, it would be such a shanda?
ReplyDeleteFunny about the bandana! I'm married, but not Jewish, and before I was married I wore a "chastity ring" where an engagement ring would be. (Because I didn't want an engagement ring, and the chastity ring meant much more.) So anybody who didn't know me well assumed I was engaged, and that was fine with me because it kept away some of the guys who would try pick-up lines on any available woman. Now I'm married, and of course have a wedding band. And sometimes I feel like waving my left hand in front of an obviously dense guy's face and saying "Hello? Do you see this ring? I'm not interested!" <sigh>
ReplyDeleteY'know what you should have done? stick whatever you were reading, with the reference, in her face, and say, "Fine! YOU tell me what OC means, then!"
ReplyDeleteAnd after she snapped back at you, snarl, "This place is a kindergarten!"
OTOH... it was still Elul, right? Ugh, bad form in any case!
Anybody who has taken an elementary sociology class, or for that matter lived in this world, realizes that dress defines us and that each and every culture has its own particular clues to status and roles- hence if you are dressed as a firefighter it is not presumptuous of those you meet to assume you are a firefighter. Whether this should be or not is material for many a blog entry. I wonder why someone as smart as you is astounded and annoyed by the fact that a head covering in the Stern culture would suggest marriage. As for the rude librarian- there are too many rude and disgruntled people everywhere but I must agree with the rules about cell phones- why should your short call to daddy be an exception?
ReplyDeletePersonally, I still don't think they can compete with Touro/Lander Russian librarians. [Which reminds me of DR's performance in last year's Purim film collection, did u ever see it Ezzie?]
ReplyDelete