Essentially, all of these political games, starting with the Clinton pull out, have turned the protest into a dumb fight over politics and absolutely nothing substantial against Ahmadenijad. Interestingly, in the short-term this will probably reflect poorly on the Democratic Party and Obama, but will not have a long-term effect on Clinton herself; as [Serach's uncle] David Luchins notes in an interesting piece in the Forward (via Gil), Jewish voters tend to reward those with records of votes in our favor. Clinton has enough of those to woo back any supporters she's losing should she run for President in 2012 should she wish to do so. This means that Clinton could have effectively skewered Obama while avoiding any appearances with Sarah Palin.
And we all know that that's something she wants...
Oh, and a great line about the issue that I read:
Obama wants to meet unconditionally with Ahmadinejad, but the Democrats won't attend a rally with Sarah Palin. Now they understand how a public meeting can legitimize their adversary.
"Now they understand how a public meeting can legitimize their adversary" If only that were really going to be true. Watch for the tap dancing that will explain away the democratic no-show in 3 dozen different ways. Understanding as one of them? Not likely.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the hat-tip, Ezzie.
ReplyDeleteI posted about your letter to the Jewish Press as well.
I think that was one of the funniest clips I've seen in a looong time. Thanks.
ReplyDelete