G. Nature is one of two things: Intelligence or accident. There is no third alternative. They actually are saying: "Accident plans ahead"; "Accident does nothing without purpose."
A. They do not say that Nature is mere accident. They call it Adaptation.
G. What difference does a new name make? Adaptation is the result of either Intelligence or accident. Is it an accident that the seeds are protected from eaters by their being coated with a slippery mucus, or by being made bitter, or by being covered by hard cases? Or is it an accident that the unripe fruit is green, and is held tightly by the tree; and that only when ripe does the fruit become colored, and then only on the outside of its skin; and that the tree then releases its grip? Adaptation, or whatever term they may use to denote processes of accident, cannot make purposeful arrangements. Without a great Intelligence in control, how could a seed come into being? If one finds a watch in the wilderness, would he attribute it to anything other than an intelligent mind? Such attitudes are possible only when men live in a dreamworld of unreality.
A. But perhaps Life is different. A watch is lifeless, but maybe Life can perform such achievements.
E. That is but another name. The choice must still be made: Life is either accident or Intelligence. To say it is neither would be an evasion.
Wednesday, September 09, 2009
A Brilliant Accident, or Utter Brilliance
I loved this post at Chana's. Excerpt: