I figure Ezzie is not around, so why not help him out a bit.
Interesting and important article here.
BTW, this woman actually read the ENTIRE bill. I wonder how many of our representatives actually did that.
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
What the Pelosi Health-Care Bill Really Says
Posted by Holy HyraxPosted by Holy Hyrax at 12:53 PM
Labels: Democrats, Health Care, Liberalism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




Name: Ezzie
Home: Kew Gardens Hills, NY
About Me: I'm a 26-year old Orthodox Jew who currently works as the controller of a publicly traded company, after spending a couple of years auditing hedge funds and a year as Mr. Mom. I attended (Touro's) Lander College for Men in Queens after two years in Israel, mostly in Yeshivat Ohr Yerushalayim (OJ). I grew up in Cleveland, OH, where I attended the Hebrew Academy of Cleveland (HAC) before heading to the Wisconsin Institute for Torah Study (WITS) for high school. I married my wife, Serach, in June 2004, and our daughter Elianna turned two in March 2008, while our daughter Kayla was born June 2008. Serach has a Master's in Education & Special Education from Touro (Summa Cum Laude), and currently works as a SEIT (Special Education Itinerant Teacher) in Queens. We've lived happily in Kew Gardens Hills, (despite its location in) NY since our marriage, and love all our friends and frequent guests.
4 Comments:
Pure propaganda piece. Detailed rebuttal.
McCaughey, of course, is the liar who wrote "No Exit," the big article against the Clinton health care plan in the 90s. She's also the liar who started the lie about health care reform leading to the euthanasia of old people.
Watch Jon Stewart destroy her.
Thanks JA
But skimming it quickly, I see a quick play that Media Matters pulls. If you go the section where they talk about racial preferences, Media Matters inserts the word "only" when in fact, she said no such thing. She even gives the page number to read it from. She wasn't lying when she copied that text that it says it WILL give it as a preference.
In fact, its vague if sec 2521 is referring to them needing to fulfill all requirements or just one of them to get the grant and sec 2533 makes explicit that they don't have to fullfill all, but at least just what McCaughey says.
Where did he destroy her exactly? She brings up things that will happen due to cuts, he says you have no evidence or it doesn't say that. Well obviously its not going to say "Senior X will not get hip replacement." DUH. But she is talkign about the natural consequence over time to what it will mean for elderly care.
I didn't like he tone though. She doesn't have good presence in front of an audience.
Post a Comment